Purchased in 2009
La Pièce
1971
Ger van Elk (1941)
piece of painted beech wood on velvet pillow
La Pièce is a momentous work in the history of Dutch art. It was made for the international exhibition ‘Sonsbeek buiten de perken’, which took place in Arnhem and the rest of the country in 1971. The exhibition introduced the Netherlands to the latest and most radical views in visual art (such as conceptual art, Land Art and minimal art) and by now ranks among the pioneering exhibitions of the previous century. This work by the then 30-year-old Ger van Elk has developed into one of the most celebrated works in conceptual art and has been exhibited on many occasions since. Van Elk made the work in response to the large-scale, and in his opinion megalomaniacal works that minimal and Land Art gave rise to. He wanted to make a work that spanned half the globe by travelling to the cleanest, most dust-free spot on the ocean in order to paint a small wooden block. In January 1971 he boarded a cargo ship heading for Greenland and eventually painted the block in question to the west of Iceland. Van Elk in 1971: “It is my intention to make a work of absolute beauty in a double sense viz. the beauty of a simple block of wood painted in an exquisite white, and the beauty in a technical sense: viz. painted in the part of the world where no speck of dust can cause any impurity: on the ocean. In this case between Ireland and Newfoundland (Canada). This idea is already very old and has a Chinese-Japanese tradition. These old ‘lacquer masters’ also went to sea in boats for the fine lacquer work for the Imperial Courts” (HP, 29-6-1971). During the exhibition the wooden block, by then entitled La Pièce (the masterpiece), was displayed in the Tropenmuseum in Amsterdam on a burgundy cushion in a glass cabinet, accompanied by a nautical chart showing where it was painted, a short explanatory text and two photographs of the act of painting itself. Van Elk also had a short film made of the painting on the high seas, which was screened in the film programme of Sonsbeek in Arnhem and has also been shown on television. Van Elk chose the Tropenmuseum to corroborate the image of the vast distance involved in making the sculpture and because the Tropenmuseum was a place where one could experience a strange and exotic world.
In one respect the work embodied a forceful and critical statement on the extent to which the dematerialization of art could be taken (a topic, if not the topic in those years), while simultaneously it opened up new and unprecedented possibilities for the application of time, space and process in visual art. Referring to this, in 1973 he said: “There are works in which I [have commented on art], the most forceful example of this is the wooden block for Sonsbeek (…) I wanted to make a work of art that is monumental in its idea, but entirely the opposite in its execution, by painting a totally minimal block of wood white, in the cleanest possible manner. That also has all kinds of ramifications. It refers to minimal art and geometric abstraction and to decadence, to the luxury of this type of exhibition [like Sonsbeek]. That is also why it had to be painted at sea, very expensive, very clean, flawless, no dust, all to be able to produce this for the Artistic Court” (cat. Eindhoven 1973). The work was also uncomfortable, because the unmistakable irony with which Van Elk seasons his art was, and still is exceptional. But despite, or indeed perhaps because of this, Van Elk’s work (and not only La Pièce) has acquired the significance of a highly relevant philosophical statement.
The work is significant to the Kröller-Müller Museum, as the museum has built up a centre of gravity around the crucial developments in visual art during the 1960s and ’70s; around minimal art, Land Art, Arte Povera and conceptual art, which have since emerged as the last of the avant-garde movements. The postmodernism that followed, which regarded the traditional and the modern as equals, did indeed make short work of the notion of avant-garde, but it has also served to place great emphasis on the historical significance of conceptual art in particular. To such a degree that interest from young artists and young visitors in recent years has grown tremendously. The term ‘sculpture’ is another pivotal aspect in the museum’s collection, and specifically the critical relationship to nature. Polarising works of art with character that dovetail with these themes belong in the Kröller-Müller Museum.
|
 |